Overview and Scrutiny
Commission – ADVISORY
MEETING
7 October
2021
6.30 - 8.30 pm
|
|
Present:
Councillors Angell
(Chair), Virgo (Vice-Chairman), Mrs Birch, Brossard, Gbadebo,
MJ Gibson, McLean, Mrs Mattick, Porter and Temperton
Parent Governor representative:
M Glanville
Apologies for absence were received from:
Councillors
Mrs McKenzie-Boyle and Mossom
Executive Member
present:
Councillor
Harrison, Executive Member for Culture, Delivery and Public
Protection
In attendance:
Councillor
Brown
Also Present:
Timothy Wheadon,
Chair of Community Safety Partnership
Superintendent
Felicity Parker, Local Police Commander Bracknell &
Wokingham
Alison
O’Meara, Head of Community Safety
<AI1>
32.
Minutes of
previous meeting
RESOLVED that the minutes of the
meeting of the Commission held on 9 September 2021 be approved as a
correct record, and signed by the Chair.
</AI1>
<AI2>
33.
Declarations of
Interest and Party Whip
There were no declarations made and no
indications that councillors would be participating while under the
party whip.
</AI2>
<AI3>
34.
Urgent Items of
Business
There were no items of urgent business.
</AI3>
<AI4>
35.
Public
Participation
No submissions had been made by members of the
public under the Council’s Public Participation Scheme for
Overview and Scrutiny.
</AI4>
<AI5>
36.
Community
Safety
Timothy Wheadon, Chair of Community Safety
Partnership, Superintendent Felicity Parker, Local Police Commander
Bracknell & Wokingham, Alison O’Meara, Head of Community
Safety and Councillor Harrison, Executive Member for Culture,
Delivery and Public Protection had been invited to attend. Meeting
as the Crime and Disorder Committee, the councillors present
received a presentation on the performance of the Community Safety
Partnership and the priorities in the Community Safety Plan for the
coming year.
In response to the questions submitted in
advance and arising from discussion it was noted:
- knife crime was observed in low numbers
across Bracknell Forest but was connected to both drug crimes and
domestic abuse so was associated with a wide range of age
groups
- Thames Valley Police were aware of
councillors concerns about speeding in the area and it was noted
that police resources to actively tackle it were an issue. A task
and finish group had been set up to consider the strategy for
tackling the issue. A volunteer Speed Watch project was discussed
and it was agreed that Councillor Mrs Birch would be interested in
being a contact for this. There were certain areas that speed
cameras could be located due to how they were calibrated but the
intention was to make sure there was increased visibility,
increased operations and stopping and seizing noisy vehicles
- it was key to increase the community’s
awareness of the issue as a deterrent because speeding was being
perpetrated by residents as well as those travelling through the
area
- that operations were focused in areas where
there was a risk of injury
- the task and finish group involved highways
officers to help engineer solutions
- concerns regarding lorries going through red
lights at the twin bridges roundabout would be fed back
- that the legal definition of stalking was in
relation to harassment where behaviour is escalating and police
consider the threat, harm and risk an individual is facing.
However, the Crime Prosecution Service determines which crimes to
prosecute
- if a property where drugs are being smoked is
an issue then this should be referred to the community safety team
who could take steps with partners such as if owned by a Housing
Association then they would work with them to issue warning letters
and if privately owned they would contact private landlords and
make them aware of the issue
- there had been over 2,000 calls reporting
domestic incidents over the past year, 74 reports of rape in the
area which was a slight decrease and 170 reports of sexual assault
not including rape
- there was recognition that these were
devasting incidents and it was sometimes difficult to gather the
evidence to hold perpetrators to account
- There is support for victims by
specially-trained officers who will signpost them to services and
also support them in court
- the CSP encouraged reporting ASB intelligence
as quickly as possible, such as gatherings being planned so that
they can take action
- prevention activities included using outreach
teams as well as communication campaigns, signage by fire service
and police and rangers with active patrolling
- when ASB activities took place in premises
there are a number of criminal and civil which could be deployed
ranging from a low-level response first but could increase to
community protection notices taking into consideration the
vulnerability of victims
- the proposed Community Safety Fund’s
(from the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner) budget
reduction of £16k over a three-year period was significant
but the phased reduction enabled the CSP to prepare and discuss
options with partners
- the Head of Community Safety was
asked to feed back the outcome of these discussions to the
Commission to understand the impact of this reduction
- every year a public consultation was
undertaken to review CSP priorities which included asking
additional questions such as where local hotspots for crime and ASB
are that police and other partners may not be aware of
- there was recognition that more work needed
to be done to report back to the public on success stories to
counter negative narratives observed on social media at times
- the focus for CSP is about preventing crime,
not just responding to it
- it was noted that not everyone is arrested as
there are other ways to deal with incidents e.g. out of court
disposals, restorative justice or payment made for damage. This
needs to be proportionate response to the crime committed
- every single victim of crime is asked how
satisfied they are with how they have been dealt with by police and
survey responses are considered by independent advisory groups
- it was not possible to confirm how accurate
or current the data was on externally managed data sites such as
police.uk
- the Local Police Commander Bracknell &
Wokingham would provide arrest rates, prosecution figures,
conviction and reoffending rates to the Commission
- in response to ASB car meets, a task and
finish group had been set up to work with partners including Parks
and Countryside and Highways to understand the locations and engage
with the organisers to try to make them understand the impact of
their events on residents. Police also undertook ‘meet and
greet’ visits to meets once identified
- the Local Police Commander of Bracknell &
Wokingham would help unblock the speedwatch training required by
the PCSO in Birch Hill and Hanworth to get this project up and
running again
- one strand of sexual exploitation was sex
workers within organised crime but this was not a common occurrence
in Bracknell Forest
- the Local Police Commander Bracknell &
Wokingham would provide data on how many knives were found when
people were stopped and searched
- it was explained that a community protection
notice was a civil order that could be put in place for a fixed
period of time with conditions to give the offender the opportunity
to stop their behaviour. These could be issued by the police, local
authority or housing associations if the powers were given to
them
- in light of recent events, residents were
advised that if they felt unsafe with any police officers they
should ask for identification and ask the officer to call in or for
the individual to call 999 in order to have confidence in the
police service
- officers were discouraged from operating in
plain clothes and this would only happen on specific operations but
action/arrests would be made by uniformed officers
- if it was not possible to challenge officers
there and then – get their officer number (displayed on their
shoulders) and complain. If you don’t feel safe, please tell
the police
The Chair thanked the representatives of the
Community Safety Partnership for their attendance and noted their
success was a reflection of the successful partnership working
undertaken. The responses to questions submitted in advance of
the meeting by Councillor Brown would be included with the
minutes. The Local Police Commander for Bracknell &
Wokingham thanked Alison O’Meara, Head of Community Safety
and her team for their approach to partnership working.
</AI5>
<AI6>
37.
Council Plan
Overview Report
The Chief Executive of Bracknell Forest
Council, Timothy Wheadon, introduced the Council Plan Overview
Report (CPOR) covering the fourth quarter of 2020/21. There had
been a delay in the circulation of the CPOR due to the impact on
staff involved in the conduction of surge testing in the GU47 area.
The Chief Executive therefore noted that the data was outdated.
The following questions were asked:
·
In relation to the reference KPI reference L396 relating to the
number of hours of staff time saved by utilising robotic process
automation the Chief Executive clarified that this was software
that undertook frequent and regular processes by picking up key
words and phrases. The project had not progressed as prioritisation
needed to be given to the roll out of Microsoft Teams.
·
In response to a query about the lack of spare laptops across the
borough it was confirmed that there was a global shortage of
microprocessors and ICT were working on utilising older
equipment.
·
The Chief Executive was asked to comment on the Prime
Minister’s speech during the Conservative Party Conference
that no housing was to be built on the green belt. The Chief
Executive reiterated that the Council had decided on the Local Plan
for Bracknell Forest and this is what would be delivered.
·
It was acknowledged that the CPOR contained a full list of what had
been achieved during this particularly difficult year.
·
It was queried how the internal review of contracts within Forest
Care could yield a saving of £0.184m during a pandemic. The
Chief Executive explained that this was actually increased income
and a positive positive rather than a reduction of provision.
·
Clarification was sought on the underspend of £0.940m within
Early Help and Communities and it was explained that the biggest
underspend had occurred because processes had been improved to
reduce the provision of bad debts. The staffing vacancies had been
held during the pandemic while they were not required rather than a
reduction in the staff team.
·
In response to a question relating to the absence of a Service
Level Agreement with South Hill Park it was noted that the Council
wanted to agree a two or three year agreement but South Hill Park
were not in a position to do that until after the budget had been
set.
·
The Chief Executive would confirm after the meeting whether the
Youth Centre in the town centre was open and welcoming young
people.
</AI6>
<AI7>
38.
Work Programme
Update
Each Panel Chair provided a verbal update on
work programme progress.
Environment and Communities
The scope for the proposed Residential Parking
review required further work before being considered by the
Commission.
Education, Skills and Growth
The scope for the proposed SEND review
required further work before being considered by the Commission and
discussions had been started with officers to establish a
deliverable schedule.
The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) review
activity programme had been completed and the report was being
drafted.
Health and Care
The Mental Health review activity programme
was in development and a series of meeting dates had been
proposed.
</AI7>
<TRAILER_SECTION>
CHAIRMAN
</TRAILER_SECTION>
<LAYOUT_SECTION>
1.FIELD_TITLE
FIELD_SUMMARY
</LAYOUT_SECTION>
<TITLE_ONLY_LAYOUT_SECTION>
2.FIELD_TITLE
</TITLE_ONLY_LAYOUT_SECTION>
<HEADING_LAYOUT_SECTION>
FIELD_TITLE
</HEADING_LAYOUT_SECTION>
<TITLED_COMMENT_LAYOUT_SECTION>
FIELD_TITLE
</ TITLED_COMMENT_LAYOUT_SECTION>
<COMMENT_LAYOUT_SECTION>
FIELD_SUMMARY
</ COMMENT_LAYOUT_SECTION>
<SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>
2.1
FIELD_TITLE
FIELD_SUMMARY
</SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>
<TITLE_ONLY_SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>
2.2
FIELD_TITLE
</TITLE_ONLY_SUBNUMBER_LAYOUT_SECTION>
For further
information contact: Kirsty
Hunt